So the
Oscars were Sunday, and for the first time since I can remember I didn't bother to watch the show live, but on two-hour TiVo-delay so I could fast-forward through the boring parts (read:
Crash musical number).
TIME has an astute recap, but I have a few other thoughts. First off, the "
Crash upset" really shouldn't have come as a surprise - and certainly didn't to me, since
I basically called it in January by pointing out "it won the SAG Award for Best Ensemble, and actors are the largest branch of Academy voters". The rest of the categories didn't really hold any big surprises, either (save of course for "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp"), and it was actually kinda refreshing to see the Academy spread the wealth. (Not only did four films take home three Oscars each, but for the first time in 49 years the top six awards went to six different films.)
Anyway, I never got around to doing a Top Ten list for last year (I'm still behind on movies, including
Capote and many others I won't admit), but the only Best Picture nominee I really agreed with / cared about was
Good Night and Good Luck. My other four would've been a tough choice between
The New World,
The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada,
Pride & Prejudice,
The Constant Gardener and
A History of Violence - with honorable mentions to
2046,
Broken Flowers,
Syriana,
Match Point and
Millions. (And yes, I also dearly loved
Serenity,
King Kong,
Batman Begins,
Wallace & Gromit and
Howl's Moving Castle.)
And while I got a kick out of
Mel Gibson speaking Mayan, crave the
gift bag and was glad they didn't hand out any Oscars in the aisles like last year (which was a travesty), I was confounded by the decision to have the orchestra play through each and every acceptance speech (which was as distracting as it was often completely incongruous in tone). Even worse were the utterly pointless (and time-sucking) "genre montages" with no identification of the individual clips, making them a test 95% of the viewing audience probably failed. In other words: "Ooo, look at all these clips of great classic movies that you should see on the big screen - except you can't - and we won't even tell you what movies the clips are from, so you can't even go buy/rent them on DVD." Brilliant, Academy. Meanwhile, after beating us over the head with the wholly impractical "movies should be seen on the big screen, not DVD" mantra (yeah, and people should also only eat out at nice restaurants), the Academy made themselves look both stupid and hypocritical, since a.) DVDs are the film industry's primary revenue stream, and b.) most Academy voters saw most of the nominated films they did on DVD screeners.
Then again, few awards shows seem to really know what they're doing. This year for the first time I won't be attending the Texas Film Hall of Fame, because once again it inexplicably conflicts with the SXSW Opening Night Premiere - and this year it's Robert Altman's
A Prairie Home Companion. And, to be frank, I'm a little annoyed that they're honoring someone who hasn't made any significant impact on the Texas Film industry while there are so many worthy people they could and should be honoring (like, say, former Texas Film Commission director Tom Copeland and two-time Oscar-nominated sound mixer John Pritchett). Meanwhile, it apparently still hasn't occurred to the powers-that-be that if you're going to do an big celebrity-driven annual awards show called the Texas Film Hall of Fame, you might want to a.) not squander it by failing to enlist a broadcast partner like IFC, AMC, Sundance, Bravo, etc., and b.) have a plan to build
an actual hall someday.